Monday, February 15, 2010

ERNEST APPEAL TO PM/FM/TOP BUREAUCRATS OF BANKING DIVISION MOF

ERNEST APPEAL TO PM/FM/TOP BUREAUCRATS OF BANKING DIVISION MOF

Bank employees negotiations /pension option /full neutralization of DA to pre 01.11.2002 pensioners is not yet settled in spite of the assurance given in the parliament somewhere in the same time during last year Every one knows very well that the implementation of sixth pay commission to central government employees has started a wage war throughout the country . The governments acceptance tantamounts to determination of /standardization of salary levels for the different cadres. GOOD GESTURE.
After that several state governments has voluntarily agreed to implement the recommendations by creating huge debt burden. OK. GOOD
Government has accepted the liberal recommendations to public sector undertakings even better than pay commission because they are classified under public sector and not covered by the pension scheme .Here also the increase is not proportionate to the profit earned etc but on adhoc basis only by agreeing certain salary levels to the position they are holding. VERY GOOD GESTURE.
Then UGC Scales, Judiciary recommendations, ONE RANK ONE PENSION, everywhere 100% justice has appeared to have been done. EXCELLENT.

WE ARE VERY SAD TO BRING YOUR KIND ATTENTION THAT THE SAME TYPE OF PATRONAGE HAS NOT BEEN EXTENDED TO THE BANK EMPLOYEES WHO WERE BETTER PAID TILL 1996.
WHAT IS THE REASON FOR YOUR NEGLECTING THE EMPLOYEES AS UN TOUCHABLES IN THE SOCIETY EVEN THOUGH THE CONCEPT OF UNTOUCHABILITY WAS ERADICATED TOTALLY .
PLEASE APPLY YOUR CONSCIOUSNESS AND THINK FOR A WHILE.

ACHIVEMENTS OF THE BANKING INDUTRY :
BANKS ARE WITH STANDING THE RECESSION AND WORLDWIDE FINANCIAL CRISIS LIKE A SOLID ROCK
THEY ARE EARNING GOOD NET PROFIT AND TRANSFERRED MORE THAN 50000 CRORES TO THE EXCHEQUER SINCE 2006
HUGE WRITTEN OFF FROM TIME TO TIME WERE SILENTLY ABSORBED WHICH IS VERY HIGH WHEN COMPARED THE WAGE COST.

Which sector the government wants to classify them . If it is under public sector mean s more than 100% salary hike has to be given. So forget about that .Since the implementation of PILLAI COMMITTEE DURING 1979 as standardization of wages BANK OFFICERS SALARY LEVEL WERE BROUGHT DOWN TO CLASS I OFFICER LEVEL. So the then government and the political leadership has agreed that the level of starting pay for officers should be the same. Whether it is bank or government or college lecturer etc.

It is the generous package given under fifth pay commission and sixth pay commission and introduction of new item called grade pay only made the salary to a very good level which has created a good purchasing power among the government/public sector employees.
Every person who is following the financial position of the government also knows that this bonanza to the employees /pensioners has created huge fiscal deficit in addition to other reasons like oil subsidy, stimulus package etc.
Now coming to the banking sector you are the major share holder and hence employer who has to take care of the employees like government employees /public sector employees. The matter should not be left to IBA/UFBU who failed miserably in coming to understanding through collective bargaining. It lost its relevance because the attitude of the government changed in favour of the employees and hence simply by a notification you can implement the pattern of sixth pay commission scales to OFFICERS WHO ARE NOT COVERED UNDER INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE ACT.JUST LIKE PILLAI COMMITTEE SCALES.
Then for award staff suitable parity can be maintained and IBA can be instructed to work out the scales along with the award staff union and settlement can be arrived even before the end of this month. This will give much needed relief to nearly eight lakhs serving employees and officers who lost hope in the negotiation drama going on and expecting some type of magic formula. HAVING AGREED FOR LIBERALISED WAGES TO NEARLY TWO CRORES OF STATE /CENTRAL GOVERNMENT /QUASI GOVERNMENT/PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYEES WHY VICTIMISING BANK EMPLOYEES ALONE BY OFFERING POOR INCREASE AND EVEN NEGOTITING FOR MINOR DIFFERENCE IN AMOUNTS.
PENSION OPTION AND 100% DA NEUTRALISATION TO PRE 01.11.2002 RETIRED EMPLOYEES/OFFICERS
Since the scales of bank and the government are more or less running in the same level the concept of pension introduced with some onerous clauses in the beginning. Around 60% of the staff accepted . Rest of the people might have feared for the onerous clauses or the then prevailing high interest rate .When the clause was withdrawn subsequently one more option should have been given. OK . Government is magnanimous enough in agreeing for one more pension option now to all the left out employees. When banks are making good profits and they are not seeking government grants why in and each every stage IBA is creating bottlenecks, nobody is understanding.
When last settlement was signed and full neutralization of DA was introduced wef 01.05.2005, unions /IBA silently omitted to cover the 100% neutralization scheme to pre 01.11.2002 pensioners. Why ? No body is there to represent the case. It was referred to the parliamentary committee and they agreed in principle. Why IBA can not suggest it and automatically extend the benefit to the senior bankers who toiled for growth of the industry to this level.
Hence I earnestly request the top echelons of the government to be liberal in the matter of bank employees wage revision and do justice .
I also request you to instruct IBA suitably to immediately accept full DA neutralization to pre 01.11.2002 pensioners.
K BALASUBRAMANIAN RETIRED SEBNIOR MANAGER VRS 2000 PENSION OPTEE

3 comments:

  1. Observations and comments are pointing out realities. Government is functioning with gross neglect of the Constitution and legal system by allowing banks and IBA to perpetrate inequalities among identical people. Governance is gradually turning into business with lack of ethics. Unions and IBA work hand in glove with each other. Banks pay wages to the leaders for no work done. They just have to sign the muster rolls without being present in office and performing the desired work. Banks collect subscriptions from the members and pay to them regularly. The destiny of bank employees is like that of a bullock cart with IBA and Unions pulling them and driving in the way they decide

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am informed that MR YM Pai former General Manager of syndicate bank and 10 others have obtained a favourable court order for full neautralisation of DA to pre 2002 vrs retirees...... kindly contact mr subbuswamy at telephone no : 0422-2442395 for more details

    ReplyDelete
  3. October 13, 2010


    SOLO APPEAL TO ALL CONCERN



    ONLY THE DECISION ON A SINGLE POINT CAN CHANGE THE SCENE
    .
    Legal Experts Help is needed

    .
    TO ALL THE BANKERS AND UNIONS/ASSOCIATIONS OPERATING IN BANKING INDUSTRY,
    --ASHOK GOEL

    REGULATION 22(4) (b) of the BANK EMPLOYEES’ PENSION REGULATIONS, 1995 WHICH PROVIDED, FORFIETURE OF FULL QUALIFYING SERVICE FOR PENSION- MAKING PENSION TO ZERO- IN CASE ANY OF THE BANKER DARE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STRIKE. THIS CLAUSE RESTRICTED OUR ENTRY IN TO THE PENSION FOLD.

    THE ABOVE CLAUSE WAS AMENDED VIDE FOLLOWING GAZETTE NOTIFICATIN.

    THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, FEBRUARY 27, 1999


    UNION BANK OF INDIA
    CENTRAL OFFICE

    Mumbai, the 2nd January 1999


    In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (f) of sub section (2) of Section 19 of the Banking Companies ( Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act , 1970 ( 5 of 1970), the Board of Directors of Union Bank of India in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India and with the previous sanction of the Central Government hereby makes the following Regulations, viz:-


    (1) These regulations may be called Union Bank of India (Employees) Pension (Amendment) Regulations, 1998

    (2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the official Gazette.

    2. In the Union Bank of India ( Employees) Pension Regulations , 1995, for clause (b) of sub regulation 4 of regulation 22, the following clause shall be substituted, namely:-

    “(b) Nothing in clause (a) shall apply to interruption caused by resignation, dismissal or removal from service.”


    Foot Note: The principle regulations were published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary dated 29th September, 1995



    Michael Bastian
    General Manager (P)



    -True copy -
    Numbering in text and contents of foot note reproduced as appearing in the Gazette itself without any variation

    WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF THIS AMENDMENT?

    WHETHER IT WAS MANDATORY TO INVITE FRESH OPTIONS AFTER THIS CHANGED REGULATIION?

    WHETHER THE AMENDMENT HAVE THE EFFECT FROM THE DATE WHEN IT WAS INCORPORATED IN THE PENSION REGULATIONS?

    WHETHER IT CAN BE INVOKED FROM THE DATE OF ITS AMENDMENT?


    A PIL IS NEEDED ON THIS SOLO POINT

    ALL CONCERNED ARE REQUESTED TO APPLY THEIR SOURCES FOR THE SAME.

    ASHOK GOEL 09868404020

    ReplyDelete